What are your thoughts about this? i surely don’t want to increase the vulnerabilities by using a bridge. If a user is only concerned with connectivity (getting Whonix ™ connected) and local ISPs do not usually hinder connections to the public Tor network, then something simpler than Bridges can be tried see. They’re probably more vulnerable, but I don’t know if I’d say “sufficiently". Vulnerable to attacks, which are circumvented by entry guards? If that is true, that also means, that bridge users are sufficiently more If you live in a uncensored area, they are not necessarily more secure than entry guards.
Its simplest to just install different apps to use with the VPN. The hardest part is actually using it, because all apps in Whonix are configured to use Tor, and only Tor. of īridges are less reliable and tend to have lower performance than other entry points. Just create a VPN client in the Whonix workstation VM.
However, if i understood Roger Dingledine, cofounder of Tor right, he said that it might not be necessarily better to use bridges if I don’t live in a country that's blocking Tor: The obvious advantage is that it is harder for potential observers (ISP, government etc) to find out that I am using it. pfSense Firewall -> Rules -> LAN -> add new rule (click the + sign): Allow the Tor bridge IPs, and make sure the 'Anti-Lockout Rule' is at the top of the rules list, and the 'Default allow LAN to any rule' is at the bottom of the list (and disabled). Hello dear Tor community, I have thought about using bridges to hide that I am using Tor (Whonix OS to be specific). Next, we allow only Tor to communicate with the internet.
0 kommentar(er)
